Who Is Behind The Ashoka Emblem Vandalism At Hazratbal Shrine?

General Ata Hasnain began by recalling a similar controversy in 2006 when the Army helped restore mosques post-earthquake. He stressed that the national emblem represents every inch of India, comparing its presence in places of worship to the currency notes carrying the same symbol. He called the act of vandalizing the emblem “deeply unfortunate,” urging that objections should be raised democratically, not through violence.

Imran Dar countered, explaining that no plaques had previously been installed inside the shrine and that this was the first time such a move was made, sparking local discontent. He argued that the issue must be understood in the context of tradition rather than framed as radicalization.

Political commentator Tehseen Poonawalla took a firm stance, condemning the mob’s actions as an attack on India’s sovereignty. He demanded stronger laws, including harsh penalties for damaging national symbols and strict action against politicians who encourage such unrest.

Bottomline by Barkha Dutt: The debate underlined the tension between faith, tradition, and national identity in Kashmir. While some see the emblem as a unifying national symbol, others perceive it as an imposition in religious spaces. What remains clear is the need for dialogue over destruction.